Posts filled under #akgenlik

Bu eren denen iran uan ki

Bu eren denen iran uan kim milletvekili yapti ya? Reis flese uacaklar haberi yok.Hilafet Sanca asa dnyadaki tm mslmanlar toplayp yeryzn size dar edecek bi HALFE ERDOAN var. Raconuda retecek size..! Daha fazlas iin @sosyal_musluman571 Destek iin paylam beenip yorum yapnz En az iki arkadanz etiketleyiniz kfr hakaret ieren yorumlar silinip sahipleri engellenecektir Paylamlarma burdan ulaabilirsiniz #sosyal_musluman571 Twitter iin @sosyal_musluman571 Facebook iin sosyal muslumann #sondakika #istanbul #receptayyiperdogan #erzurum #adana #gaziantep #sivas #konya #samsun #trabzon #bursa #kocaeli #sakarya #rize #ankara #kayseri #trkiye #siyaset #receptayyiperdoan #rte #erdogan #2023 #akparti #akp #akgenlik #akgenclik #reis #erdoan

BAKAN.!!
 #receptayyiperd

BAKAN.!! #receptayyiperdoan #reis #dunyalideri #milletinadami #uzunadam #adamgibiadam #RTE #RES #tekmillet #tekbayrak #tekvatan #tekdevlet #reisinadamlariyiz #reisinyolundayz #reis #rte #rterdogangencligi #recep #tayyip #erdoan #rterdogan #receptayyiperdogan #bakan #bakomutan #akp #akparti #akgenlik #akgen #aklselim #uniak #akreis Daha fazlas iin @yanindayiz_uzun_adam destek iin fotoraflarmz beenip yorum yapabilirsiniz. Dava kardelerine destek: @reisinneslii @cumhurulider @uzunadamfani @teksevdaerdogan @genctayyibci @dunyaninlideri_ @_turksiyaseti

Bu millet her zaman bana

Bu millet her zaman bana bela olacak hal tohumlarHilal haca galip gelecek Allah nurunu tamamlayacak.. Daha fazlas iin @sosyal_musluman571 Destek iin paylam beenip yorum yapnz En az iki arkadanz etiketleyiniz kfr hakaret ieren yorumlar silinip sahipleri engellenecektir Paylamlarma burdan ulaabilirsiniz #sosyal_musluman571 Twitter iin @sosyal_musluman571 #sondakika #istanbul #erzurum #adana #gaziantep #sivas #konya #samsun #trabzon #bursa #kocaeli #sakarya #rize #ankara #kayseri #diyarbakr #siyaset #receptayyiperdoan #uzunadam #2023 #akparti #akp #akgenlik #reis #akgenclik #tsk #osmanl #lkc #bozkurt

Neden bilmiyorum ama okuy

Neden bilmiyorum ama okuyunca anlamszca gldm inallah sizdede olur Daha fazlas iin @sosyal_musluman571 Destek iin paylam beenip yorum yapnz En az iki arkadanz etiketleyiniz kfr hakaret ieren yorumlar silinip sahipleri engellenecektir Paylamlarma burdan ulaabilirsiniz #sosyal_musluman571 Twitter iin @sosyal_musluman571 #sondakika #istanbul #izmir #erzurum #adana #gaziantep #sivas #konya #samsun #trabzon #bursa #kocaeli #sakarya #rize #ankara #kayseri #diyarbakr #siyaset #receptayyiperdoan #rte #uzunadam #2023 #akparti #akp #akgenlik #reis #akgenclik #tsk #osmanl

An extract on #akgenlik

Musical keyboard, a set of adjacent keys or levers used to play a musical instrument Keyboard instrument, an instrument with a musical keyboard Electronic keyboard, a keyboard instrument in which key presses complete an electric circuit MIDI keyboard, an electronic keyboard used to send MIDI data to a computer or synthesizer Pedal keyboard, a foot-operated keyboard that is placed on the floor Keyboardist, a musician who plays keyboard instruments Keyboard (magazine), a publication about musical instruments such as the piano Synthesizer, an electronic instrument that is commonly referred to as a keyboard

By definition, the error in the measured value of the IPK's mass is exactly zero; the IPK is the kilogram. However, any changes in the IPK's mass over time can be deduced by comparing its mass to that of its official copies stored throughout the world, a rarely undertaken process called "periodic verification". The only three verifications occurred in 1889, 1948, and 1989. For instance, the US owns four 90% platinum / 10% iridium (Pt10Ir) kilogram standards, two of which, K4 and K20, are from the original batch of 40 replicas delivered in 1884. The K20 prototype was designated as the primary national standard of mass for the US. Both of these, as well as those from other nations, are periodically returned to the BIPM for verification. Extraordinary care is exercised when transporting prototypes. In 1984, the K4 and K20 prototypes were hand-carried in the passenger section of separate commercial airliners. Note that none of the replicas has a mass precisely equal to that of the IPK; their masses are calibrated and documented as offset values. For instance, K20, the US's primary standard, originally had an official mass of 1 kg39 micrograms (g) in 1889; that is to say, K20 was 39 g less than the IPK. A verification performed in 1948 showed a mass of 1 kg19 g. The latest verification performed in 1989 shows a mass precisely identical to its original 1889 value. Quite unlike transient variations such as this, the US's check standard, K4, has persistently declined in mass relative to the IPKand for an identifiable reason. Check standards are used much more often than primary standards and are prone to scratches and other wear. K4 was originally delivered with an official mass of 1 kg75 g in 1889, but as of 1989 was officially calibrated at 1 kg106 g and ten years later was 1 kg116 g. Over a period of 110 years, K4 lost 41 g relative to the IPK. Beyond the simple wear that check standards can experience, the mass of even the carefully stored national prototypes can drift relative to the IPK for a variety of reasons, some known and some unknown. Since the IPK and its replicas are stored in air (albeit under two or more nested bell jars), they gain mass through adsorption of atmospheric contamination onto their surfaces. Accordingly, they are cleaned in a process the BIPM developed between 1939 and 1946 known as "the BIPM cleaning method" that comprises firmly rubbing with a chamois soaked in equal parts ether and ethanol, followed by steam cleaning with bi-distilled water, and allowing the prototypes to settle for 710 days before verification. Before the BIPM's published report in 1994 detailing the relative change in mass of the prototypes, different standard bodies used different techniques to clean their prototypes. The NIST's practice before then was to soak and rinse its two prototypes first in benzene, then in ethanol, and to then clean them with a jet of bi-distilled water steam. Cleaning the prototypes removes between 5 and 60 g of contamination depending largely on the time elapsed since the last cleaning. Further, a second cleaning can remove up to 10 g more. After cleaningeven when they are stored under their bell jarsthe IPK and its replicas immediately begin gaining mass again. The BIPM even developed a model of this gain and concluded that it averaged 1.11 g per month for the first 3 months after cleaning and then decreased to an average of about 1 g per year thereafter. Since check standards like K4 are not cleaned for routine calibrations of other mass standardsa precaution to minimize the potential for wear and handling damagethe BIPM's model of time-dependent mass gain has been used as an "after cleaning" correction factor. Because the first forty official copies are made of the same alloy as the IPK and are stored under similar conditions, periodic verifications using a large number of replicasespecially the national primary standards, which are rarely usedcan convincingly demonstrate the stability of the IPK. What has become clear after the third periodic verification performed between 1988 and 1992 is that masses of the entire worldwide ensemble of prototypes have been slowly but inexorably diverging from each other. It is also clear that the mass of the IPK lost perhaps 50 g over the last century, and possibly significantly more, in comparison to its official copies. The reason for this drift has eluded physicists who have dedicated their careers to the SI unit of mass. No plausible mechanism has been proposed to explain either a steady decrease in the mass of the IPK, or an increase in that of its replicas dispersed throughout the world. This relative nature of the changes amongst the world's kilogram prototypes is often misreported in the popular press, and even some notable scientific magazines, which often state that the IPK simply "lost 50 g" and omit the very important caveat of "in comparison to its official copies".Even well respected organizations incorrectly represent the relative nature of the mass divergence as being one of mass loss, as exemplified by this site at Science Daily, and this site at PhysOrg.com, and this site at Sandia National Laboratories. The root of the problem is often the reporters' failure to correctly interpret or paraphrase nuanced scientific concepts, as exemplified by this 12 September 2007 story by the Associated Press published on PhysOrg.com. In that AP story, Richard Daviswho used to be the NIST's kilogram specialist and now works for the BIPM in Francewas correctly quoted by the AP when he stated that the mass change is a relative issue. Then the AP summarized the nature of issue with this lead-in to the story: "A kilogram just isn't what it used to be. The 118-year-old cylinder that is the international prototype for the metric mass, kept tightly under lock and key outside Paris, is mysteriously losing weight if ever so slightly". Like many of the above-linked sites, the AP also misreported the age of the IPK, using the date of its adoption as the mass prototype, not the date of the cylinder's manufacture. This is a mistake even Scientific American fell victim to in a print edition. Moreover, there are no technical means available to determine whether or not the entire worldwide ensemble of prototypes suffers from even greater long-term trends upwards or downwards because their mass "relative to an invariant of nature is unknown at a level below 1000 g over a period of 100 or even 50 years". Given the lack of data identifying which of the world's kilogram prototypes has been most stable in absolute terms, it is equally valid to state that the first batch of replicas has, as a group, gained an average of about 25 g over one hundred years in comparison to the IPK. What is known specifically about the IPK is that it exhibits a short-term instability of about 30 g over a period of about a month in its after-cleaned mass. The precise reason for this short-term instability is not understood but is thought to entail surface effects: microscopic differences between the prototypes' polished surfaces, possibly aggravated by hydrogen absorption due to catalysis of the volatile organic compounds that slowly deposit onto the prototypes as well as the hydrocarbon-based solvents used to clean them. It has been possible to rule out many explanations of the observed divergences in the masses of the world's prototypes proposed by scientists and the general public. The BIPM's FAQ explains, for example, that the divergence is dependent on the amount of time elapsed between measurements and not dependent on the number of times the artifacts have been cleaned or possible changes in gravity or environment. Reports published in 2013 by Peter Cumpson of Newcastle University based on the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of samples that were stored alongside various prototype kilograms suggested that one source of the divergence between the various prototypes could be traced to mercury that had been absorbed by the prototypes being in the proximity of mercury-based instruments. The IPK has been stored within centimetres of a mercury thermometer since at least as far back as the late 1980s. In this Newcastle University work six platinum weights made in the nineteenth century were all found to have mercury at the surface, the most contaminated of which had the equivalent of 250 g of mercury when scaled to the surface area of a kilogram prototype. Scientists are seeing far greater variability in the prototypes than previously believed. The increasing divergence in the masses of the world's prototypes and the short-term instability in the IPK has prompted research into improved methods to obtain a smooth surface finish using diamond turning on newly manufactured replicas and has intensified the search for a new definition of the kilogram. See Proposed future definitions, below.

logo